|
By Mary Shen Bainbridge, arts reporter
Windy City Times
Published July 16th 2003
Playwright: Lance Eliot Adams At: Pyewacket/Hunger
And Dread Theatre at Chopin Studio, 1543 W. Division St. Phone: (773)
275-2201; $15 Runs through: Aug. 16
One could argue that ALL the iconography of American Life in the
1950s was a whitewash—wartime propaganda that didn’t
know when to quit. But there’s no denying the impact in 1956
of Peyton Place, Grace Metalious’ censor-defying novel exposing
the sordid underside of society in a New England factory town,
its title to this day synonymous with such deceptively peaceful-looking
communities. In recent years, however, vintage media-generated
images of the mid-twentieth century, fortified by nostalgic myopia
(e.g. Happy Days, Grease), have reasserted themselves to once again
portray the decade as a time of quaint and happy innocence.
And in that misrepresentation lies the only justification for
Lance Eliot Adams’ Close Your Eyes, a collection of museum-archive
clichés not yet meriting the status of archetypes. We have
the teenagers—the clean-cut football hero, the self-styled
rebel, the nerdy sidekick, the thrill-seeking nympho, the shy girl-geek.
And we have the adults—the protective father, the progressive
father, the seductively reclusive widow, the mentally and physically
impaired creep—ineffectual, if not outright counterproductive,
role models for the youngsters who look to them for guidance.
Adams extends the genre to add a few surprises to its canon of
shockers—if the “good” citizens are not as they
appear, neither are some of the “bad.” Having introduced
his characters with no hint of irony, however, Adams seems not
to know what to do with them, contenting himself with portraiture
of a dystopia oblivious to the social changes hindsight vision
informs us will someday engineer its liberation. But two hours
is a long time to stare at a single picture, especially since most
of the company for this joint Pyewacket/Hunger and Dread Theatre
production, like the playwright, look to have barely been doodles
in their grandmothers’ algebra notebooks in 1957—the
play’s alleged period—and thus limited in the depth
they might have brought to their stereotypical roles.
|